Late gadolinium enhancement following covid-19 infection does not predict outcome: a single-centre study

182 Figure 1Cardiovascular events in COVID-19 Survivors by LGE Status[Figure omitted. See PDF] 182 Figure 2All-cause mortality in COVID-19 Survivors by LGE Status[Figure omitted. See PDF]Conflict of InterestNone

CMR Tissue Characterization and Course of Acute SARS-CoV-2 type B.1.1.529-Associated Myocarditis in a Professional Soccer Player

› We report the case of a young professional soccer player who underwent cardiac MRI (CMR) for work-up of discrete intermit-tent chest pain and subtle ST segment elevations in the ECG after having been tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 type B.1.1.529 despite full vaccination including recent mRNA booster. › Troponin levels were significantly increased and myocarditis was suspected. Comprehensive CMR including CINE and late gadolinium enhancement as well as multi-parametric T1/T2 mapping techniques revealed local hypokinesia and swelling of the posterolateral wall with non-ischemic late gadolinium enhancement and increased T2 relaxation time compatible with acute viral myocarditis. The patient was admitted to a cardiology ward for rhythm and troponin monitoring and was discharged after two days of uneventful rhythm monitoring and with decreased troponin levels. › Adhering to current recommendations the patient was advised to abstain from moderate-to high-intensity sports and exercise for 3-6 months. After 6 months of exercise avoidance, follow-up ECG showed regression of prior ST segment elevations, and Holter ECG as well as a treadmill exercise stress test did not reveal any abnormalities. Follow-up CMR was performed before return-to-sports which revealed persisting myocardial fibrosis but complete regression of myocardial edemam and excluded ongoing inflammation. › This example underscores the value of multi-parametric CMR tissue characterization for the work-up of suspected SARS-CoV-2 associated myocarditis, as well as for follow-up before return-to-sports. © 2023, Dynamic Media Sales Verlag. All rights reserved.

Evaluation of cardiac involvement in patients with clinical post-COVID-19 syndrome

Introduction: The underlying pathophysiology of Post-COVID-19 syndrome remains unknown, but increased cardiometabolic demand and state of mitochondrial dysfunction have emerged as candidate mechanisms. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) provides insight into pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cardiovascular disease and 31-phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) allows noninvasive assessment of the myocardial energetic state. Purpose(s): We sought to assess whether Post-COVID-19 syndrome is associated with abnormalities of myocardial structure, function, perfusion and tissue characteristics or energetic derangement. Method(s): Prospective case-control study. A total of 20 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Post-COVID-19 syndrome (seropositive) and no prior underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) and ten matching controls underwent 31P-MRS and CMR at 3T at a single time point. (Figure 1) All patients had been symptomatic with acute COVID-19, but none required hospital admission. Result(s): Between the Post-COVID-19 syndrome patients and matched contemporary controls there were no differences in myocardial energetics (phosphocreatine to ATP ratio), in cardiac structure (biventricular volumes, left ventricular mass), function (biventricular ejection fractions, global longitudinal strain), tissue characterization (T1 and extracellular volume [ECV] fraction mapping, late gadolinium enhancement) or perfusion (myocardial rest and stress blood flow, myocardial perfusion reserve). One patient with Post-COVID-19 syndrome showed subepicardial hyperenhancement on the late gadolinium enhancement imaging compatible with prior myocarditis, but no accompanying abnormality in cardiac size, function, perfusion, ECV, T1, T2 mapping or energetics. This patient was excluded from statistical analyses. (Table 1) Conclusion(s): In this study, the overwhelming majority of patients with a clinical Post-COVID-19 syndrome with no prior CVD did not exhibit any abnormalities in myocardial energetics, structure, function, blood flow or tissue characteristics.

Recurrent Angina in a Patient With Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.

The ubiquity of coronary angiography has increased the identification of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Currently among cardiologists, there is neither a consensus nor comprehensive diagnostic blueprint for accurate evaluation of patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. We present a case of a patient with recurrent chest pain. A diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries secondary to coronary artery vasospasm was determined with the use of multimodality imaging cardiac imaging.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) complicating myocarditis

Myocarditis can lead to myocardial infarction in the absence of coronary artery obstruction. We report a case of probable myocarditis, complicated by myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. A 19-year-old man presented with chest pain typical of myocarditis. He was a smoker but was otherwise well. Electrocardiogram revealed diffuse ST-elevation and echocardiography revealed a thin, akinetic apex. Troponin-T levels on admission were raised leading to an initial diagnosis of myocarditis being made. However, late gadolinium enhancement study on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated transmural enhancement typical of ischaemia. Coronary angiogram was normal, leading to a likely diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. It is important to highlight that coronary assessment remains important when working up for myocarditis, as myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries can often complicate myocarditis in cases of normal angiography. Another important lesson was on how cardiac magnetic resonance imaging provided vital evidence to support underlying ischaemia despite normal coronary angiogram, leading to a diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries remains a broad 'umbrella' term and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, as well as more invasive coronary imaging techniques during angiography, can further assist in its diagnosis. Our case provides a reminder that myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries, although increasingly recognised, remains under-diagnosed and can often overlap with peri-myocarditis, highlighting the need to employ multi-modality imaging in guiding management.Copyright © The Author(s) 2021.

Pathophysiologic mechanism for MYOcarditis in COVID-19 VAccinations ('MYOVAx' Study)

Objective: This is the first prospective cohort study in Singapore to investigate the COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis to understand its pathophysiology. Introduction: Acute myocarditis and other cardiovascular symptoms have been observed to be associated with the two mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines-namely Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273)-currently in-use in Singapore. The mechanisms through which myocarditis occurs are unknown, hence our study aims to understand the pathophysiology of myocarditis associated with COVID-19 vaccines. Method(s): Patients with onset of cardiac manifestations were recruited from multiple hospital outpatient clinics between November 2021 and September 2022. Clinical history and physical examination data was collected with blood sample collection, echocardiography, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), coronary angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at recruitment and 6-month follow-up. Analysis of biomarkers, genetic, serological and MRI data was conducted. Result(s): As of 6 September 2022, a total of 5 patients have been enrolled (4 males, 1 female). The most commonly reported symptoms across all patients were chest pain/discomfort (80%), followed by palpitations (40%). MRI evidence of myocarditis has been detected in 2 (50%) of the male patients, of which both reported two or more symptoms occurring 1-2 days post-vaccination. Both patients have each received at least two doses of either the Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine or Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccine. Their MRI findings were consistent with myocarditis. On late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, epicardial enhancement at the basal inferolateral segment and mid-wall enhancement at the apical anterior, lateral and inferior walls were observed in one patient. Patchy, mid-wall LGE in the basal inferior/inferolateral wall was observed in the other patient. No MRI evidence of myocarditis was available for the sole female patient. Conclusion(s): While more data is needed to definitively prove the association of the two mRNA-based Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines with post-vaccination myocarditis, we believe our findings may support further investigations to enable risk stratification for vaccine-associated myocarditis and identify potential preventative strategies accordingly.

Myocardial Injury and Altered Gene Expression Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Infection or mRNA Vaccination.

SARS CoV-2 enters host cells via its Spike protein moiety binding to the essential cardiac enzyme angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) 2, followed by internalization. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are RNA sequences that are translated into Spike protein, which follows the same ACE2-binding route as the intact virion. In model systems, isolated Spike protein can produce cell damage and altered gene expression, and myocardial injury or myocarditis can occur during COVID-19 or after mRNA vaccination. We investigated 7 COVID-19 and 6 post-mRNA vaccination patients with myocardial injury and found nearly identical alterations in gene expression that would predispose to inflammation, coagulopathy, and myocardial dysfunction.

Myocardial Tissue Characterization in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Studies of Patients Recovering From COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis.

Background Meta-analysis can identify biological factors that moderate cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial tissue markers such as native T1 (longitudinal magnetization relaxation time constant) and T2 (transverse magnetization relaxation time constant) in cohorts recovering from COVID-19 infection. Methods and Results Cardiac magnetic resonance studies of patients with COVID-19 using myocardial T1, T2 mapping, extracellular volume, and late gadolinium enhancement were identified by database searches. Pooled effect sizes and interstudy heterogeneity (I2) were estimated with random effects models. Moderators of interstudy heterogeneity were analyzed by meta-regression of the percent difference of native T1 and T2 between COVID-19 and control groups (%ΔT1 [percent difference of the study-level means of myocardial T1 in patients with COVID-19 and controls] and %ΔT2 [percent difference of the study-level means of myocardial T2 in patients with COVID-19 and controls]), extracellular volume, and the proportion of late gadolinium enhancement. Interstudy heterogeneities of %ΔT1 (I2=76%) and %ΔT2 (I2=88%) were significantly lower than for native T1 and T2, respectively, independent of field strength, with pooled effect sizes of %ΔT1=1.24% (95% CI, 0.54%-1.9%) and %ΔT2=3.77% (95% CI, 1.79%-5.79%). %ΔT1 was lower for studies in children (median age: 12.7 years) and athletes (median age: 21 years), compared with older adults (median age: 48 years). Duration of recovery from COVID-19, cardiac troponins, C-reactive protein, and age were significant moderators for %ΔT1 and/or %ΔT2. Extracellular volume, adjusted by age, was moderated by recovery duration. Age, diabetes, and hypertension were significant moderators of the proportion of late gadolinium enhancement in adults. Conclusions T1 and T2 are dynamic markers of cardiac involvement in COVID-19 that reflect the regression of cardiomyocyte injury and myocardial inflammation during recovery. Late gadolinium enhancement and to a lesser extent extracellular volume, are more static biomarkers moderated by preexisting risk factors linked to adverse myocardial tissue remodeling.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis in the COVID-19 Era

In the COVID-19 pandemic, to minimize aerosol-generating procedures, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) was utilized at our institution as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for diagnosing infective endocarditis (IE). This retrospective study evaluated the clinical utility of CMR for detecting IE among 14 patients growing typical microorganisms on blood cultures or meeting modified Duke Criteria. Seven cases were treated for IE. In 2 cases, CMR results were notable for possible leaflet vegetations and were clinically meaningful in guiding antibiotic therapy, obtaining further imaging, and/or pursuing surgical intervention. In 2 cases, vegetations were missed on CMR but detected on TEE. In 3 cases, CMR was non-diagnostic, but patients were treated empirically. There was no difference in antibiotic duration or outcomes over 1 year. CMR demonstrated mixed results in diagnosing valvular vegetations and guiding clinical decision-making. Further prospective controlled trials of CMR Vs TEE are warranted. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.

Admission and follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging findings in BNT162b2 Vaccine-Related myocarditis in adolescents.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the pattern and severity of myocardial injury in patients with COVID-19 vaccination associated myocarditis. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define the myocardial damage occurring after BNT162b2 vaccination, raise awareness about adverse reactions developing after vaccination, and determine the patterns and scope of Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. PATIENTS/METHODS: A total of 9 patients diagnosed with vaccine-associated myopericarditis were followed up. RESULTS: The mean age of the patient at diagnosis was 15.3 ± 1.0 (range: 14-17) years, and all patients were male. Seven patients presented with myocarditis symptoms after their second vaccine dose, one patient presented with pericarditis symptoms after his first dose, and the other patient presented with myocarditis symptoms after his booster dose. The median time at presenting to the hospital was 3 (range: 2-22) days. Seven (77.7%) patients had abnormal electrocardiography (ECG) findings, and the most prevalent finding was diffuse ST-segment elevation. Initial cardiac MRI results were abnormal in all patients, where 8 (88.8%) patients had late gadolinium enhancement, and 5 (55.5%) had myocardial edoema. Three patients showed local left ventricular wall-motion abnormalities. In their follow-up MRIs 3-6 months later, myocardial edoema was present in 2 (28.5%) patients, while late gadolinium enhancement was present in all patients (7/7, 100%, 2 patients did not have control MRI time). Hypokinetic segments were still present in one of the 3 patients. No negative cardiac events were observed in the short-term follow-up of any patient. CONCLUSION: Further follow-up evaluation and larger multicenter studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of persistent cardiac MRI abnormalities.

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Findings in Patients Recovered from COVID-19 Pneumonia and Presenting with Persistent Cardiac Symptoms: The TRICITY-CMR Trial.

The prevalence and clinical consequences of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related non-ischemic cardiac injury are under investigation. The main purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of non-ischemic cardiac injury using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with persistent cardiac symptoms following recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia. We conducted a single-center, cross-sectional study. Between January 2021 and May 2021, we enrolled 121 patients with a recent COVID-19 infection and persistent cardiac symptoms. Study participants were divided into those who required hospitalization during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection (n = 58; 47.9%) and those non-hospitalized (n = 63; 52.1%). Non-ischemic cardiac injury (defined as the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) lesion and/or active myocarditis in CMR) was detected in over half of post-COVID-19 patients (n = 64; 52.9%). LGE lesions were present in 63 (52.1%) and active myocarditis in 10 (8.3%) post-COVID-19 study participants. The majority of LGE lesions were located in the left ventricle at inferior and inferolateral segments at the base. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of LGE lesions (35 (60.3%) vs. 28 (44.4%); p = 0.117) or active myocarditis (6 (10.3%) vs. 4 (6.3%); p = 0.517) between hospitalized and non-hospitalized post-COVID-19 patients. However, CMR imaging revealed lower right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF; 49.5 (44; 54) vs. 53 (50; 58) %; p = 0.001) and more frequent presence of reduced RVEF (60.3% vs. 33.3%; p = 0.005) in the former subgroup. In conclusion, more than half of our patients presenting with cardiac symptoms after a recent recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia had CMR imaging abnormalities indicating non-ischemic cardiac injury. The most common finding was LGE, while active myocarditis was detected in the minority of patients. CMR imaging abnormalities were observed both in previously hospitalized and non-hospitalized post-COVID-19 patients. Further research is needed to determine the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19 infection and the optimal management of patients with suspected post-COVID-19 non-ischemic cardiac injury.

CMR Findings in COVID-19 Recovered Patients: A Review on Parametric Mapping, Feature-Tracking, and LGE

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization raised the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status to a pandemic level. The disease caused a global outbreak with devastating consequences, and a fair percentage of patients who have recovered from it continue experiencing persistent sequelae. Hence, identifying the medium and long-term effects of the COVID-19 disease is crucial for its future management. In particular, cardiac complications, from affected function to myocardial injuries, have been reported in these patients. Considering that cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is the gold standard in diagnosing myocardial involvement and has more advantages than other medical imaging modalities, assessing the outcomes of patients who recovered from COVID-19 with CMR could prove beneficial. This review compiles common findings in CMR in patients from the general population who recovered from COVID-19. The CMR-based techniques comprised parametric mapping for analyzing myocardial composition, feature tracking for studying regional heart deformation, and late gadolinium enhancement for detecting compromised areas in the cardiac muscle. A total of 19 studies were included. The evidence suggests that it is more likely to find signs of myocardial injury in patients who recovered from COVID-19 than in healthy controls, including changes in T1 and T2 mapping relaxation times, affected strain, or the presence of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) lesions. However, more than two years after the outbreak, there is still a lack of consensus about how these parameters may indicate cardiac involvement in patients who recovered from the disease, as limited and contradictory data is available. Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s).

Cardiac involvement in patients 1 year after recovery from moderate and severe COVID-19 infections.

Background: Some patients suffered persistent cardiac symptoms after hospital discharge following COVID-19 infection, including chest tightness, chest pain, and palpitation. However, the cardiac involvement in these patients remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of COVID-19 infection on the cardiovascular system after 1 year of recovery in patients hospitalized with persistent cardiac symptoms. Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study, a total of 32 patients who had COVID-19 (11 diagnosed as severe COVID-19 and 21 as moderate) with persistent cardiac symptoms after hospital discharge were enrolled. Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was performed on all patients. Comparisons were made with age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 13), and age-, sex- and risk factor-matched controls (n = 21). Further analysis was made between the severe and moderate COVID-19 cohorts. Results: The mean time interval between acute COVID-19 infection and CMR was 462 ± 18 days. Patients recovered from COVID-19 had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p = 0.003) and increased extracellular volumes (ECVs) (p = 0.023) compared with healthy controls. Focal late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was found in 22 (68.8%) patients, mainly distributed linearly in the septal mid-wall or patchily in RV insertion point. The LGE extent in patients with severe COVID-19 was higher than that in patients with moderate COVID-19 (p = 0.009). Conclusion: This 1-year follow-up study revealed that patients with persistent cardiac symptoms, after recovering from COVID-19, had decreased cardiac function and increased ECV compared with healthy controls. Patients with COVID-19 predominately had a LGE pattern of septal mid-wall or RV insertion point. Patients with severe COVID-19 had greater LGE extent than patients with moderate COVID-19.

Different Impacts on the Heart After COVID-19 Infection and Vaccination: Insights From Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

Introduction: Myocarditis-like findings after COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) infection and vaccination were reported by applying cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). These results are very heterogenous and dependent on several factors such as hospital admission or outpatient treatment, timing of CMR, and symptomatic load. This retrospective study aimed to identify differences in myocardial damage in patients with persistent symptoms both after COVID-19 infection and vaccine by applying CMR. Materials and Methods: This study entails a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for CMR between August 2020 and November 2021 with persistent symptoms after COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Patients were compared to healthy controls (HC). All patients underwent a CMR examination in a 1.5-T scanner with a scan protocol including: cine imaging for biventricular function and strain assessment using feature tracking, T2 mapping for the quantification of edema, and T1 mapping for diffuse fibrosis and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) for the detection and quantification of focal fibrosis. Patients were divided into a subacute COVID-19 (sCov) group with symptoms lasting < 12 weeks, post-COVID-19 (pCov) group with symptoms > 12 weeks, and patients after COVID-19 vaccination (CovVac). Results: A total of 162 patients were recruited of whom 141 were included for analysis. The median age in years (interquartile range (IQR)) of the entire cohort was 45 (37-56) which included 83 women and 58 men. Subgroups were as follows (total patients per subgroup, median age in years (IQR), main gender): 34 sCov, 43 (37-52), 19 women; 63 pCov, 52 (39-58), 43 women; 44 CovVac, 43 (32-56), 23 men; 44 HC (41 (28-52), 24 women). The biventricular function was preserved and revealed no differences between the groups. No active inflammation was detected by T2 mapping. Global T1 values were higher in pCov in comparison with HC (median (IQR) in ms: pCov 1002ms (981-1023) vs. HC 987ms (963-1009; p = 0.005) with other parings revealing no differences. In 49/141 (34.6%) of patients, focal fibrosis was detectable with the majority having a non-ischemic pattern (43/141; 30.4%; patients) with the subgroups after infection having more often a subepicardial pattern compared with CovVac (total (% of group): sCov: 7/34(21%); pCov 13/63(21%); CovVac 2/44(5%); p = 0.04). Conclusion: Patients after COVID-19 infection showed more focal fibrosis in comparison with patients after COVID-19 vaccination without alterations in the biventricular function.

Case report: Case series of isolated acute pericarditis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations.

During the worldwide ongoing immunization campaign against SARS-CoV-2, growing data on very rare but potentially harmful side effects of such vaccines arise since approval trials have not been adequately powered to detect those events. Besides the already reported vaccine-related myocarditis, which primarily occurs in young male individuals, our attention was recently drawn to a series of older male and female patients, who were referred to our institutions with isolated acute pericarditis without myocardial damage, shortly after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We describe a series of five adult patients presenting with chest pain, shortness of breath and isolated pericarditis with and without pericardial effusion after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All patients underwent echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance, and the corresponding findings, including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and T1 and T2 mapping are reported herein. To our knowledge, such cases have not been systematically reported in the current literature so far.

Cardiac MRI in post COVID acute myocarditis: A case report.

Myocarditis is an acute or chronic inflammatory reaction of the heart muscle frequently associated with viral infections and post-viral immune-mediated responses. Recently the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been identified as a cause of myocarditis in COVID-19 patients. The role of cardiac MRI in such patients hence has become a subject of concern. Thus, we present a case of post-COVID-19 myocarditis where cardiac MRI was helpful in establishing the diagnosis.

Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance in children with vaccine-associated myocarditis.

Myocarditis is a rare complication of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. We previously reported a case series of 15 adolescents with vaccine-associated myocarditis, 87% of whom had abnormalities on initial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in 80%. We performed follow-up CMRs to determine the trajectory of myocardial recovery and better understand the natural history of vaccine-associated myocarditis. Case series of patients age < 19 years admitted to Boston Children's Hospital with acute vaccine-associated myocarditis following the BNT162b2 vaccine who had abnormal CMR at the time of initial presentation, and underwent follow-up testing. CMR assessment included left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, T2-weighted myocardial imaging, LV global native T1, LV global T2, extracellular volume (ECV), and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Ten patients (9 male, median age 15 years) with vaccine-associated myocarditis underwent follow-up CMR at a median of 92 days (range 76-119) after hospital discharge. LGE was persistent in 80% of patients, though improved from prior in all cases. Two patients (20%) had abnormal LV global T1 at presentation, which normalized on follow-up. ECV decreased between acute presentation and follow-up in 6/10 patients; it remained elevated at follow-up in 1 patient and borderline in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: CMR performed ~3 months after admission for COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis showed improvement of LGE in all patients, but persistent in the majority. Follow-up CMR 6-12 months after acute episode should be considered to better understand the long-term cardiac risks. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Myocarditis is a rare side effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. •Late gadolinium enhancement is present on most cardiac magnetic resonance at the time of acute presentation. WHAT IS NEW: •Late gadolinium enhancement improved on all repeat cardiac magnetic resonance at 3-month follow-up. •Most patients still had a small amount of late gadolinium enhancement, the clinical significance of which is yet to be determined.

Diagnostic Yield of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Athletes with and without Features of the Athlete's Heart and Suspected Structural Heart Disease.

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a second-line imaging test in cardiology. Balanced enlargement of heart chambers called athlete's heart (AH) is a part of physiological adaptation to regular physical activity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of CMR in athletes with suspected structural heart disease (SHD) and to analyse the relation between the coexistence of AH and SHD. We wanted to assess whether the presence of AH phenotype could be considered as a sign of a healthy heart less prone to development of SHD. This retrospective, single centre study included 154 consecutive athletes (57 non-amateur, all sports categories, 87% male, mean age 34 ± 12 years) referred for CMR because of suspected SHD. The suspicion was based on existing guidelines including electrocardiographic and/or echocardiographic changes suggestive of abnormality but without a formal diagnosis. CMR permitted establishment of a new diagnosis in 66 patients (42%). The main diagnoses included myocardial fibrosis typical for prior myocarditis (n = 21), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 17, including 6 apical forms), other cardiomyopathies (n = 10) and prior myocardial infarction (n = 6). Athlete's heart was diagnosed in 59 athletes (38%). The presence of pathologic late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was found in 41 patients (27%) and was not higher in athletes without AH (32% vs. 19%, p = 0.08). Junction-point LGE was more prevalent in patients with AH phenotype (22% vs. 9%, p = 0.02). Patients without AH were not more likely to be diagnosed with SHD than those with AH (49% vs. 32%, p = 0.05). Based on the results of CMR and other tests, three patients (2%) were referred for ICD implantation for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death with one patient experiencing adequate intervention during follow-up. The inclusion of CMR into the diagnostic process leads to a new diagnosis in many athletes with suspicion of SHD and equivocal routine tests. Athletes with AH pattern are equally likely to be diagnosed with SHD in comparison to those without AH phenotype. This shows that the development of AH and SHD can occur in parallel, which makes differential diagnosis in this group of patients more challenging.

[Cardiac compromise in patients recovered from COVID-19 without troponin elevation assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging]. / Hallazgos en resonancia cardiaca post COVID-19 en pacientes sin elevación de troponinas.

Background: The disease caused by coronavirus (COVID-19) affects the cardiovascular system, whether by direct viral aggression or indirectly through systemic inflammation and multiple organ compromise. A widely used method to determine cardiac injury is troponin measurement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of cardiac involvement (CINV) in a population recovered from COVID-19, referred to cardiac MRI (CMR), who did not present troponin elevation. Methods: There were 156 patients that recovered from COVID-19 and who did not present troponin elevation referred to CMR. CINV was considered to be the presence of: late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), edema, myocarditis, pericarditis, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or depressed right ventricular systolic dysfunction (RVSD). Results: Prevalence of CINV was 28.8%, being more frequent in men (p=0.002), in patients who required hospitalization (p=0.04) and in those who experienced non-mild cases of infection (p=0.007). RVSD (17.9%) and LVSD (13.4%) were the most frequent findings. The rate of myocarditis was 0.6%. LGE manifested in 7.1% of patients and its presence was related to less left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.0001) and right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) (p=0.04). Conclusion: In patients who recovered from COVID-19, 28.8% of CINV was found. It was more frequent in men, in patients who required admission and in patients with cases of non-mild infection. The patients that presented LGE had less LVEF and RVSF.

Antecedentes: La enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) afecta al sistema cardiovascular, ya sea mediante la agresión directa viral o indirectamente por medio de la inflamación sistémica y afectación multiorgánica. Las troponinas son ampliamente utilizadas para determinar lesión cardiaca. La finalidad de este estudio es evaluar la prevalencia de afectación cardiaca (ACARD) en una población recuperada de COVID-19, derivada a resonancia magnética cardiaca (RMC), sin elevación de troponinas al momento del estudio. Métodos: Ciento cincuenta y seis pacientes que se recuperaron de COVID-19 y que no presentaron elevación de troponinas fueron derivados a RMC. Se consideró ACARD a la presencia de: realce tardío de gadolinio (RTG), edema, miocarditis, pericarditis, deterioro de la función sistólica del ventrículo izquierdo (DFSVI) y/o depresión de la función sistólica del ventrículo derecho (DFSVD). Resultados: La prevalencia de ACARD fue del 28.8%, siendo más frecuente en hombres (p = 0.002), en pacientes que requirieron hospitalización (p = 0.04) y en aquellos que cursaron cuadro no leve de infección (p = 0.007). La DFSVD (17.9%) y la DFSVI (13.4%) fueron las hallazgos más frecuentes. La frecuencia de miocarditis fue del 0.6%. El RTG se manifestó en el 7.1% de los pacientes y se relacionó con menor fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) (p = 0.0001) y derecho (FEVD) (p = 0.04). Conclusión: La prevalencia de ACARD fue del 28.8%. Esta es más frecuente en hombres, en pacientes que requirieron internación y que cursaron cuadros de infección no leve. La miocarditis presentó una prevalencia muy baja. Los pacientes que presentaron RTG tuvieron menor FEVI y FSVD.

Utility of exercise testing to assess athletes for post COVID-19 myocarditis.

Purpose: This study assessed a functional protocol to identify myocarditis or myocardial involvement in competitive athletes following SARS-CoV2 infection. Methods: We prospectively evaluated competitive athletes (n = 174) for myocarditis or myocardial involvement using the Multidisciplinary Inquiry of Athletes in Miami (MIAMI) protocol, a median of 18.5 (IQR 16-25) days following diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. The protocol included biomarker analysis, ECG, cardiopulmonary stress echocardiography testing with global longitudinal strain (GLS), and targeted cardiac MRI for athletes with abnormal findings. Patients were followed for median of 148 days. Results: We evaluated 52 females and 122 males, with median age 21 (IQR: 19, 22) years. Five (2.9%) had evidence of myocardial involvement, including definite or probable myocarditis (n = 2). Three of the 5 athletes with myocarditis or myocardial involvement had clinically significant abnormalities during stress testing including ventricular ectopy, wall motion abnormalities and/or elevated VE/VCO2, while the other two athletes had resting ECG abnormalities. VO2max, left ventricular ejection fraction and GLS were similar between those with or without myocardial involvement. No adverse events were reported in the 169 athletes cleared to exercise at a median follow-up of 148 (IQR108,211) days. Patients who were initially restricted from exercise had no adverse sequelae and were cleared to resume training between 3 and 12 months post diagnosis. Conclusions: Screening protocols that include exercise testing may enhance the sensitivity of detecting COVID-19 related myocardial involvement following recovery from SARS-CoV2 infection.